|
Post by SeaRat on Oct 3, 2020 13:56:49 GMT -8
Rick, No, this is not too old to ask a question, and all questions are good. Not to worry about that. The capillary gauge will read deep at altitude in fresh water. The capillary gauge is the simplest gauge there is, as it is simply a tube with one end plugged. As the pressure increases, water enters the tube. According to the gas laws, the pressure becomes twice as great at one atmosphere (34 feet in fresh water at sea level). So at one atmosphere, the water will have gone half-way up the tube. At 68 feet, or three atmospheres absolute, the water will be 2/3 up this tube, etc. But at altitude, the air is less dense, while the water pressure is the same, and so the water will compress the air further, making the scale on the gauge read deeper. That is why the number read needs to be multiplied by the correction factor (0.887 at 4,000 feet altitude), to get the accurate depth. But we divers of ol' never did that. We simply used the reading, deeper than the real depth, as a safety factor for our dive when calculating repetitive dives. Oh, and there is no internal sensing mechanism in a capillary guage, though a temperature sensor would be helpful. . The reason is that on a hot day, submerging a capillary depth gauge in cold water causes the air inside the capillary tube to contract, thereby increasing the depth reading in a way which the pressure compensation number doesn't incorporate. John
|
|
|
Post by rikdog7 on Oct 3, 2020 14:35:29 GMT -8
John, Thank you for that detailed answer. I did not think about the density of the air being compressed in the capillary. Honestly I hadn't put much thought into depth gauges and their readings at different altitudes. So far I have never done any diving greater than 2,000 ft. Rick
|
|
|
Post by SeaRat on Oct 3, 2020 16:10:05 GMT -8
Rick, Not a lot of divers are now even aware of the capillary depth guage. Here is a photo of one from Dacor in use: IMG_2725 by John Ratliff, on Flickr Note the asymetric numbering, which is the way that these guages show the depth. At 33 feet, the water will have come up the tube half way. And it decreases acconding to the gas laws as the depth increases. Eventually, it becomes hard to determine accurately the depth. This one shows almost twenty feet of depth (easier to see when viewing it underwater, rather than from this flash photo). But this is the simpliest depth guage ever, and actually can be home-made using a small diameter PVC tube and wrapping it around, then putting a numbering index with 33 feet at half way down the tube, 66 feet 2/3 down, etc. John
|
|
|
Post by cnotthoff on Dec 12, 2020 9:30:47 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by SeaRat on Jan 4, 2021 17:27:52 GMT -8
Here's a dive I made in 1975, along with some altitude calculations for Blue Lake, Oregon. Blue Lake Log001 by John Ratliff, on Flickr Note my notes on the right side of the decompression table: Schedule: 100'/50" Alt. / 3500 ft Correction: 80' = 92' = 100' schedule In other words, we needed to use the 100 foot decompression schedule for a planned dive to 80 feet at 3500 feet altitude. Blue Lake Log002 by John Ratliff, on Flickr
|
|