Post by SeaRat on Aug 27, 2022 21:30:58 GMT -8
Ty,
I could easily make the regulator comply. The hose on my primary regulator is 8 feet long. The back-up second stage can easily accommodate a bungee, and I could easily put a bolt snap on my primary. But, I won’t be buying a backplate, harness and buoyancy wing anytime soon.
The Seal Fins probably will work with a helicopter turn, but I’ll have to try that in open water next time out. I’ll also try the back-up kick. Looking at the demo, it appears that the regular fins are also not made for a backup kick either (actually, there is no fin made for a backup right now, in my opinion). I know Bob’s theory about relief on the upstroke being a way of minimizing cramps. But, I simply disagree. To me, the upstroke is also needed to balance out the downstroke on the other leg. The foot pocket is the best means of minimizing cramps, and the Force Fin has one of the best in the business. But loss of the upstroke handicaps this design; the Seal Fins rectify that loss.
I have been diving 63 years now, and have worked to define best practices in diving. I have a BCD patent to my name too (that’s the Para-Sea BCD I’m wearing in the photo above). While no manufacturer has adopted the ideas I have put together, that does not mean they are invalid. It means that companies look to make money, without regard to some of the safety aspects of their products. The requirement of a heavy backplate, back bladders, and the requirements on certain regulators, for instance, are driven mostly by trying to make money rather than best diving practices. I dove a back-BCD which was built into my wetsuit for a number of years, but also had a CO2 vest on when doing it. The reason? I wanted a front-mount inflation system for surface safety. I also have no need to use a helicopter turn, as I can easily reverse my course of travel in other ways. In current, I will usually do a 3/4 flip turn to reverse in the river. Sometimes, I’m already swimming down on my back towards the bottom, and use the current to help make the turn (try that with a helicopter turn). These kinds of requirements are a turn-off to me.
John in Clear Lake with Bill Herder's BC by John Ratliff, on Flickr
This shows me diving Bill Herter’s back-mounted BCD built into one of his custom wetsuits. It’s the white area of the wetsuit.
IQ-6 Buoyancy diagrams by John Ratliff, on Flickr
Here’s an example of one of my discussion points from a paper for NAUI’s IQ 6 in the mid-1970s.
Last year, I was told by the lifeguards at High Rocks that a Clackamas County Dive Team was in the water. I dove, and.with my swimming techniques passed them going downstream. They were concentrating on their frog kicks so hard I don’t think they even saw me. So my impression of these techniques is not that great.
John
I could easily make the regulator comply. The hose on my primary regulator is 8 feet long. The back-up second stage can easily accommodate a bungee, and I could easily put a bolt snap on my primary. But, I won’t be buying a backplate, harness and buoyancy wing anytime soon.
The Seal Fins probably will work with a helicopter turn, but I’ll have to try that in open water next time out. I’ll also try the back-up kick. Looking at the demo, it appears that the regular fins are also not made for a backup kick either (actually, there is no fin made for a backup right now, in my opinion). I know Bob’s theory about relief on the upstroke being a way of minimizing cramps. But, I simply disagree. To me, the upstroke is also needed to balance out the downstroke on the other leg. The foot pocket is the best means of minimizing cramps, and the Force Fin has one of the best in the business. But loss of the upstroke handicaps this design; the Seal Fins rectify that loss.
I have been diving 63 years now, and have worked to define best practices in diving. I have a BCD patent to my name too (that’s the Para-Sea BCD I’m wearing in the photo above). While no manufacturer has adopted the ideas I have put together, that does not mean they are invalid. It means that companies look to make money, without regard to some of the safety aspects of their products. The requirement of a heavy backplate, back bladders, and the requirements on certain regulators, for instance, are driven mostly by trying to make money rather than best diving practices. I dove a back-BCD which was built into my wetsuit for a number of years, but also had a CO2 vest on when doing it. The reason? I wanted a front-mount inflation system for surface safety. I also have no need to use a helicopter turn, as I can easily reverse my course of travel in other ways. In current, I will usually do a 3/4 flip turn to reverse in the river. Sometimes, I’m already swimming down on my back towards the bottom, and use the current to help make the turn (try that with a helicopter turn). These kinds of requirements are a turn-off to me.
John in Clear Lake with Bill Herder's BC by John Ratliff, on Flickr
This shows me diving Bill Herter’s back-mounted BCD built into one of his custom wetsuits. It’s the white area of the wetsuit.
IQ-6 Buoyancy diagrams by John Ratliff, on Flickr
Here’s an example of one of my discussion points from a paper for NAUI’s IQ 6 in the mid-1970s.
Last year, I was told by the lifeguards at High Rocks that a Clackamas County Dive Team was in the water. I dove, and.with my swimming techniques passed them going downstream. They were concentrating on their frog kicks so hard I don’t think they even saw me. So my impression of these techniques is not that great.
John