|
Post by spirou on May 23, 2024 10:36:24 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by luis on May 24, 2024 4:52:48 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by spirou on May 24, 2024 6:38:30 GMT -8
Hello Luis I am happy to read you. I knew the problems, I have several valve, Spiro , scubapro, beuchat, sos....they are identified, and the tank also. But for example la spirotechnique produced during 60's to middle 80's 25x2 SI, after the standard changed 25x2 ISO that become the standard thread here. I don't know in USA. SI and Iso Are very close, question of tolerance, and also with SI the peak of the thread is a bit cut To your country , USA I know that you use 3/4 NPSM, during long time, but is it still use with new tank? And in Europe there also an 3/4 imperial 🥳. So I agree, I must be very careful, but I have test tank 3/4 and M25x2 iso that I used to identified, and if not possible, I asked to specialist in hydro centre. Finally question for you, I look lots of documents, but the torque, is very variable, for example , Aqualung in 90's give 5kgm, and begin 2000's. 7kgm La spirotechnique in 80's. 5kgm. US divers for rigid manifold, docs. +-30 FtPb, that make 4.15kgm, metal sub 3/4NPSM docs give 50 FtPb (6.9Kgm) I just reassemble my twin in 3/4NPSM beuchat manifold I torque a little 5kgm So Luis my I ask to you , which torque you use, when you screw the valve. In the tank thread. (Other advise are also WELCOME 🤗) Respectfully Fred
|
|
|
Post by luis on May 24, 2024 16:19:19 GMT -8
Hi Fred, The first question is easy. Yes, our standard scuba valve thread in the US is the 3/4 NPS (ISO 228) imperial threads. This thread standard is used in all modern standard scuba cylinder, both aluminum and steel cylinders. About the torque, of all the mechanical threaded joints I have worked on, the actual torque value in this situation is probably one of the least critical. That is, as long as there is good visible metal to metal contact, between the valve and the tank, around the entire perimeter. That is what keeps the O-ring from extruding. The metal-to-metal contact is extremely important and that is what you need to look for. The amount of torque applied, should not affect this, at least not with the corner O-ring seal in the US 3/4” NPSM connection. The European 25x2 connection appears to use a face O-ring seal (with an O-ring groove under the valve) and may require a bit of torque to compress the O-ring. Any excess torque doesn’t really accomplish much. Once the tank is pressurized the valve will not twist off and the fear of it twisting off at very low pressure is extremely unlikely even with the lowest toque setting you mentioned. Again, the most important is to make sure there is no gap between the valve and the tank to avoid O-ring extrusion. The actual torque value, just pick any of them or just make it tight (with a good size wrench). Good luck. BTW, I find it interesting that you all are using kilogram*meters, instead of Newton*meters. Don't get me wrong, we are still using Foot*pounds and inch*pounds. And of course those are pounds of force, not mass.
|
|
cg43
Pro Diver
Posts: 117
|
Post by cg43 on May 25, 2024 4:02:33 GMT -8
Hello Luis
BTW, I find it interesting that you all are using kilogram*meters, instead of Newton*meters. :)
Don't get me wrong, we are still using Foot*pounds and inch*pounds. And of course those are pounds of force, not mass .
As you anticipate kg*m is used the same way as Foot*pounds .
Sure it is wrong , the right spelling is kp*m , or kilopond * m = kg*m/sec^2 In every serious book you will find kp*m .
I grew up with meter/kilogramm/sec. and i'm used to calculate in meter/kilogramm/sec. But as Mr. Newton became my hero it was to late for my muscel feeling to work in newton . If i had to imagine how strong I had to püll on a wrench i made the Nm/10 conversion (or better approximation) in kp*m and use the force to lift up the same number kg as number kp . If you are used pounds and feet your imagination should work with Foot*pounds .
Greetings Rainer
|
|
|
Post by spirou on May 25, 2024 10:25:49 GMT -8
Hello Luis. I thank you for your response. I now know that I could still buy 3/4 NPSM bottles in the USA, for some of my 3/4 NPSM taps In fact, all the tightening torques for screwing in the valves are those used in the technical documentation that I could find. I'm used to switching from one to the other, and I also have conversion tables, I use what I find as information, and I calibrate my torque wrenches accordingly. Besides, all my torque wrenches have the three scales, FtPb, Kgm, and Nm. Maybe you didn't understand my question. In fact I was wondering what tightening torque do you use, when you reassemble the valves, given that in the aqualung documentation for what seems to me to be exactly the same model of valve, I found two different torques once 5 Kgm during the 90s and in the latest version 7 Kgm in the 2000s. The spirotechnics gave 5 Kgm in all the documents that I found on their valve from the 70s until the 90s, for the 3/4 and the 25x2. In fact it is confusing from one manufacturer to another, the tightening torques are different for identical threads. Respectfully Fred
|
|
|
Post by spirou on May 25, 2024 10:59:56 GMT -8
|
|
cg43
Pro Diver
Posts: 117
|
Post by cg43 on May 25, 2024 15:12:24 GMT -8
Hallo Fred
The nessesary torque for preload (200 bar tank pressure) is about 30 Nm or 3 kp*m
The max. permissible torque for a thread M 25x2 in alu is approximately 300 Nm or 30 kg*m
This wide range is easy accessibel without a torque wrench . With an stiff wrench it's easy to feel the point the O ring starts its deformation and the point when the metal surfaces made contact . Afterwards the valve had to be firm .
Greetings Rainer
|
|
|
Post by spirou on May 25, 2024 21:06:53 GMT -8
Hallo Fred The nessesary torque for preload (200 bar tank pressure) is about 30 Nm or 3 kp*m The max. permissible torque for a thread M 25x2 in alu is approximately 300 Nm or 30 kg*m This wide range is easy accessibel without a torque wrench . With an stiff wrench it's easy to feel the point the O ring starts its deformation and the point when the metal surfaces made contact . Afterwards the valve had to be firm . Greetings Rainer Hello Rainer Thanks for these technical information. I was surprised by the big difference between the torques that I could read in the technical documentation of the producers. So now I know the minimum, and the max permissible , and the range is very large. Respectfully Fred
|
|